vaxjedi: (Default)
[personal profile] vaxjedi
So I gave into the Sexual campatibility meme. Resluts in the cut below.

The odd thing is that I've not seem any these results from this test in a lot of people's LJ is that the scores seem universally low. Are people really that sexually incompatible? Or is there something weird about the test?



linnea4 64%
kshandra 60%
tesselene 57%
hopeevey 50%
anandav 50%
galeogirl 46%
pliny 44%
wolfprincess 44%
femakita 42%
alaindan 40%
mortalcity 36%
amberfox 34%
kyril 33%
vulpine137 31%
auryn29a 29%
novapsyche 29%
norbman 27%
duncang 27%
rikhei 27%
toilteanas 26%
funjon 25%
gundo 23%
rat_bastard 21%
seeker9 18%
laurelyn22 17%
How sexually compatible with me are you?
Take the NEW sexual compatibility quiz at LJMatch!

Date: 2003-10-20 07:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auryn29a.livejournal.com
I'm very sure it's the test. It seems to have a weird idea of what sexual compatibility should mean.

Date: 2003-10-20 08:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eleri.livejournal.com
I'm not even on it. Bah!

Date: 2003-10-20 09:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ororo.livejournal.com
My email address has changed since I last did anything with LJmatch, so I can't get my password to try it. :)

Date: 2003-10-20 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] docwebster.livejournal.com
Resluts, eh?

Date: 2003-10-20 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wheezecat.livejournal.com
Yeah, it's gotta be the test.
To quote [livejournal.com profile] kyril from my journal

"They really need to give a better description of how those who don't ejaculate are supposed to answer the Green Eggs & Ham ejaculation questions (Would you, could you, in a box? Would you, could you with a fox?). Especially since they've got both giving-end and receiving-end versions, and ask everyone to answer both."

Date: 2003-10-20 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kyril.livejournal.com
Not to mention that just because you're curious about something means it will be anywhere near as good as you imagine it, or won't until you get good at it. Not to mention that a lot of the things I've tried and liked, I like in moderation. Not to mention that when I want love and intimacy more than mindblowing orgasms, I don't usually care about or want to bother with most of their categories.

Date: 2003-10-20 11:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] femakita.livejournal.com
I got 42 percent. I will consider that auspicious. :D

I think that the low percentage is that, in a way, there were almost too many questions. Or, rather, that of all the questions (of which there were many), added on top was the kinda-sorta-curious-yes-no-maybe-etc. that you could pick for each one. Whereas on the personality test it was a lot of "this, or that". You'd have to be really super compatible with someone down to the tiniest of details in order to get a really high percentage... and if you were identical in all those teensy ways, what would be left to show each other?

Date: 2003-10-20 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] femakita.livejournal.com
Ha! I didn't even catch that.

*giggle*

Date: 2003-10-21 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] linnea4.livejournal.com
We're weird I think. :) I don't mind being on top.... er.. ahem... anyway... um... back to your regularly scheduled blog.

Helen

(I'd come up with something witty to say, but I'm still tired from yesterday.)

Re: *giggle*

Date: 2003-10-22 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] linnea4.livejournal.com
wouldn't that be the point? :)

Helen

Profile

vaxjedi: (Default)
vaxjedi

November 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 1st, 2026 10:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios